Polycarbonate vs. Acrylic for Chemical Resistance

Thach Nguyen Ngoc |

Quick Guide: Polycarbonate vs. Acrylic Choice

For those needing an immediate recommendation based on typical industrial scenarios:

  • Best for High-Impact / Low-Mounting (Shop Floors, Gyms): Polycarbonate (PC). Its superior IK rating prevents shattering from tool strikes or debris.
  • Best for Chemical Vapors / Washdown (Barns, Car Washes): Acrylic (PMMA). It resists "whitening" from ammonia and typical alkaline soaps much better than standard PC.
  • The Golden Rule: Always verify compatibility with the facility’s Safety Data Sheet (SDS). When in doubt, perform a 72-hour spot test (see Section 3).

1. Polycarbonate vs. Acrylic: The Real-World Trade-off

Industrial and commercial lighting fails in chemically aggressive environments far more often than expected. While LEDs are robust, the lens or housing material is often the "Achilles' heel" when exposed to industrial cleaners, vapors, or process byproducts.

Methodology & Data Source: The recommendations and thresholds in this guide are derived from Hyperlite’s internal field data, spanning over 500+ customer support case histories and site audits. While we reference industry standards like IEC 60529 (Ingress Protection), these findings serve as practical heuristics for contractors and are not a substitute for controlled laboratory testing or manufacturer-provided Safety Data Sheets (SDS).

At a high level, the trade-off is a balance between mechanical toughness and chemical stability:

  • Polycarbonate (PC): High impact resistance and thermal stability, but generally more vulnerable to aromatic hydrocarbons, esters, and ketones.
  • Acrylic (PMMA): Superior resistance to many common cleaners and UV exposure, but inherently brittle and prone to cracking under mechanical stress.

A common industry pitfall is assuming that an IP65 rating implies chemical immunity. As defined by IEC 60529 (Clause 1.1), IP ratings strictly measure protection against the ingress of solid particles and water—they do not account for the chemical permeability or corrosive degradation of the enclosure material itself.

1.1 Typical Performance Comparisons

The following table outlines general behavior patterns observed in industrial lighting applications. Important: Chemical resistance is a variable spectrum; performance depends on concentration, temperature, and exposure duration.

Property / Exposure Scenario Polycarbonate (PC) Acrylic (PMMA)
Impact Resistance (IK Rating) Excellent; typically achieves IK08–IK10 (5 to 20 Joules of impact energy per IEC 62262). Moderate to poor; rarely exceeds IK04 (0.5 Joules) without specialized additives.
Flexing / Vibration Resilient; handles mechanical vibration well in high-traffic zones. Brittle; prone to stress-cracking at mounting points or tight screw locations.
Alkaline Cleaners (High pH) Often poor; prone to surface "whitening" or haze (heuristic rule). Generally better, though high concentrations still pose a long-term risk.
Organic Solvents (Ketones, Esters) High risk of immediate stress cracking (crazing). Better than PC, but still susceptible to certain industrial solvents.
Ammonia Vapors (Barns/Cleaning) Susceptible to long-term degradation and haze. Highly resistant; maintains clarity in ammonia-rich environments (e.g., livestock).
Service Temperature Stable up to approx. 120°C (heuristic, based on typical UL 746B RTI ratings for PC). Stable up to approx. 70–90°C (heuristic; material softens earlier than PC).

LED High Bay fixtures lighting a high-ceiling industrial warehouse assembly floor

2. How Chemical Attack Damages Lenses

Chemical degradation in polymers isn't always a "melt." In a lighting context, it usually manifests as optical or structural failure.

2.1 Crazing and Stress Cracking

For polycarbonate, the most frequent failure mode is crazing—the appearance of microscopic cracks on the surface. These cracks scatter light (reducing LUX levels) and create points of structural weakness.

Based on our field observations, crazing often begins at stress concentrators, such as overtightened screws or gasket compression zones. When an incompatible chemical (like a strong degreaser) contacts these stressed areas, the polymer chains "unzip" significantly faster than they would on a flat, relaxed surface.

2.2 Vapor Exposure: The "Invisible" Threat

In enclosed spaces like car wash bays or livestock barns, concentrated vapors can be more damaging than liquid splashes. Vapors can permeate the small gaps in non-hermetic seals and attack the lens from both sides.

Furthermore, temperature acts as a damage multiplier. According to the Arrhenius principle in polymer science, chemical reaction rates typically increase as temperature rises. Since LED lenses can operate 20–40°C above ambient temperature (measured at the lens surface during continuous operation), a chemical that appears "safe" at room temperature may cause rapid failure during peak fixture operation.

3. Practical On-Site Compatibility Testing

Because "industrial grade" cleaners vary wildly in formulation, we recommend a two-stage field test before any large-scale installation.

3.1 The 24–72 Hour Spot-Soak Method

This procedure helps identify immediate incompatibilities that might not be listed on a general compatibility chart.

  1. Obtain Material Samples: Use off-cut lens pieces or spare lenses provided by the manufacturer.
  2. Prepare Test Solution: Use the exact concentration and temperature used in daily facility operations.
  3. Apply patches: Soak a lint-free cloth in the solution and secure it to the lens surface. Cover with plastic wrap to prevent evaporation.
  4. Inspect (Angled Light): After 24, 48, and 72 hours, clean the lens and inspect under a high-intensity flashlight at an oblique (angled) light path. Look for "frosting," pitting, or fine spiderweb cracks.

Internal Case Note: Based on our technical support history, this field protocol identifies the majority of severe material incompatibilities before they become a site-wide warranty issue.

3.2 Safety First: The SDS Review

Before testing, consult the Safety Data Sheet (SDS) for every chemical used in the facility, as mandated by the OSHA Hazard Communication Standard (29 CFR 1910.1200).

  • Section 9 (Physical/Chemical Properties): Check the pH. High alkalinity (>10) is a significant risk factor for polycarbonate.
  • Section 10 (Stability/Reactivity): Look for "Materials to Avoid." If it lists "plastics" or "polycarbonate" specifically, do not proceed with liquid contact.

4. Decision Framework: When to Specify PC vs. Acrylic

Choosing the right material requires a "Risk Matrix" approach, balancing mechanical impact against chemical exposure.

4.1 Decision Matrix for Typical Environments

Environment Primary Risk Recommended Material Rationale
Auto Repair Shop Tool impact / Oil mist Polycarbonate High IK rating is essential for safety near lifts and tools.
Livestock Barn Ammonia / Washdown Acrylic (or PC with testing) Ammonia is aggressive to PC; Acrylic handles vapors better.
Food Processing Frequent Sanitization Acrylic or Glass Resists "whitening" from harsh disinfectants better than PC.
Car Wash Bay Alkaline Soaps / Pressure Polycarbonate (Coated) Needs impact resistance for high-pressure spray; requires testing.
Laboratory / Cleanroom Solvents / Wipe-downs Acrylic High clarity and resistance to alcohol-based wipes.

4.2 Practical Rules of Thumb (Heuristics)

  1. The Impact Rule: If the fixture is mounted below 10 feet in a high-traffic area, prioritize Polycarbonate (IK08+) to prevent shattering.
  2. The Solvent Rule: If the facility uses aromatic solvents or strong degreasers, avoid standard Polycarbonate unless it features a specialized chemical-resistant hard-coating.
  3. The Neutral pH Strategy: Regardless of material, using neutral pH (7.0–8.5) detergents is the single most effective way to extend the life of any plastic lens (based on field longevity data).

5. Integrating Material Choice with Maintenance

A "set and forget" mentality often leads to premature failure. Effective facility management requires a maintenance playbook.

5.1 Cleaning Protocol Checklist

  • Step 1: Dust the lens with compressed air or a soft brush to avoid abrasive scratching.
  • Step 2: Use a lukewarm water solution with a mild, non-filming detergent.
  • Step 3: Rinse thoroughly. Residual cleaner left on a hot lens is a primary cause of stress crazing.
  • Step 4: Air dry or use a clean, damp chamois. Never use dry paper towels, which are often abrasive enough to create micro-scratches.

5.2 Retirement Criteria: When to Replace

A chemically damaged lens is a safety hazard. Based on Hyperlite's internal maintenance standards, we recommend replacement if:

  • Light Loss: Task-level light output drops by 20% (Measured using a handheld LUX meter at a fixed 1-meter distance from the lens center compared to initial install levels).
  • Structural Integrity: Visible cracks or crazing extend across more than 25% of the lens surface area (Heuristic for maintaining the enclosure's IK impact integrity).
  • Seal Failure: Crazing around the edges has compromised the gasket's ability to maintain the IP rating, evidenced by moisture or dust inside the lens.

6. Conclusion and Key Takeaways

For contractors and facility managers, the "Polycarbonate vs. Acrylic" debate isn't about which material is "better," but which is more appropriate for the specific chemical and mechanical profile of the job site.

  • Polycarbonate is the "Rugged" choice: Best for impact, but sensitive to chemicals.
  • Acrylic is the "Stable" choice: Best for clarity and chemical resistance, but prone to breakage.
  • Verification is Mandatory: Always cross-reference the fixture's material with the facility's SDS and perform a 72-hour spot test.
  • IP/IK Ratings are Limited: These standards (IEC 60529/62262) define physical protection but do not certify chemical compatibility.

By following these field-tested protocols, you can ensure your lighting investment survives the harsh reality of industrial environments.


Disclaimer

This guide is for informational purposes and is based on general engineering principles and Hyperlite field experience. It does not constitute a legal guarantee of material performance. Chemical formulations change frequently; always consult with the specific chemical manufacturer and the lighting OEM for warranty-compliant cleaning agents.

References & Authoritative Sources

Leave a comment

Please note: comments must be approved before they are published.