NEW YEAR SALE丨UP TO $120 OFF

Verification Checklists: Auditing UFO Factory Test Reports for RFPs

Richard Miller |

Verification Checklists: Auditing UFO Factory Test Reports for RFPs

In large-scale industrial lighting procurement, the gap between a manufacturer’s datasheet and real-world performance can represent a million-dollar liability. For B2B procurement professionals and electrical contractors, the "factory test report" is the primary defense against performance inflation and compliance failure. However, a report is only as valid as the accreditation of the lab that issued it and the consistency of the data within it.

This technical guide provides a rigorous framework for auditing UFO high bay test reports—specifically IES LM-79, LM-80, and TM-21—to ensure sourced fixtures meet Request for Proposal (RFP) mandates and qualify for utility rebates. As noted in the 2026 Commercial & Industrial LED Lighting Outlook: The Guide to Project-Ready High Bays & Shop Lights, verifiable data is the only metric that mitigates project risk.

The LM-79 Audit: Decoding the Performance "Report Card"

The IES LM-79-19 Standard (Approved Method for the Electrical and Photometric Measurements of Solid-State Lighting Products) defines how to measure total luminous flux, electrical power, efficacy, and chromaticity. While most vendors provide a PDF summary, a professional audit requires the full report.

1. Lab Accreditation and Date Verification

The first step is verifying that the testing laboratory is accredited by a recognized body, such as the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP).

  • The Red Flag: Reports from unaccredited in-house factory labs often lack the rigorous calibration required for RFP compliance.
  • The Check: Cross-reference the lab’s name against the NVLAP directory. Ensure the report date is within the last 3–5 years; older reports may not reflect current LED chip bins or driver efficiencies.

2. Matching Test Conditions to Application

Performance metrics are highly sensitive to thermal and electrical environments.

  • Ambient Temperature: Standard LM-79 tests are conducted at 25°C (77°F). If your facility operates at 40°C (104°F), the efficacy (lm/W) will be lower than the report states.
  • Test Voltage: Verify the report uses the same voltage as your site (e.g., 277V). Power factor and Total Harmonic Distortion (THD) vary significantly between 120V and 277V.

Logic Summary: Our audit methodology assumes that a 5% discrepancy in efficacy (e.g., 145 lm/W vs. 150 lm/W) is often the result of "golden sample" testing—where a hand-picked, high-performing unit is sent to the lab instead of a random production sample.

LED High Bay lights in a high-ceiling warehouse with light meter and IES lighting standards clipboard

DLC QPL Verification: The Gatekeeper of Rebates

The DesignLights Consortium (DLC) Qualified Products List (QPL) is the industry’s primary gatekeeper for commercial lighting incentives. For a project to be "rebate-ready," the product must appear on this list.

Cross-Referencing Model Numbers

A common pitfall is a model number mismatch. A manufacturer might have a "DLC Listed" fixture, but the specific wattage or Color Correlated Temperature (CCT) you are buying may not be the one listed.

  • The Check: Search the DLC QPL Database using the exact SKU.
  • Standard vs. Premium: DLC Premium requires higher efficacy (typically ≥150 lm/W for high bays) and stricter integral controls. If your RFP mandates "Premium," a "Standard" listing is a compliance failure.

Efficacy and Lumen Maintenance

The DLC SSL Technical Requirements have evolved. Auditors must ensure the product meets Version 5.1 or higher. This version includes requirements for "Spectral Quality" and "Light Distribution," moving beyond simple energy efficiency to include occupant comfort.

Safety and Regulatory Compliance: Beyond the Sticker

A "UL Listed" sticker on a fixture is insufficient for B2B procurement. You must verify the specific standard and the file number.

1. Verifying UL and ETL Listings

Industrial luminaires must typically comply with UL 1598 (Luminaires) for general safety and UL 8750 for the LED equipment.

  • The Audit: Use the UL Product iQ Database or the Intertek ETL Listed Mark Directory to search the manufacturer's E-file number (e.g., E512345).
  • Listed vs. Recognized: Ensure the fixture is "UL Listed" (the whole assembly is safe) rather than just containing "UL Recognized" components (individual parts are safe, but the assembly may not be).

2. Electromagnetic Interference (EMI)

All LED drivers must comply with FCC Part 15 regulations. In facilities with sensitive equipment (hospitals, precision manufacturing, or labs), non-compliant drivers can cause catastrophic interference. Auditors should request the FCC test report to confirm the driver is a "Class A" (industrial) or "Class B" (residential/commercial) device.

Technician inspecting machined aluminum housings for an LED High Bay fixture on a factory bench

Lifetime Projections: The LM-80 and TM-21 Audit

LEDs do not "burn out" like traditional lamps; they slowly dim. The industry standard for "end of life" is $L_{70}$—the point where the light output drops to 70% of its original brightness.

The "6x Rule" of TM-21

The IES TM-21-21 Standard provides the mathematical method to project long-term lumen maintenance based on IES LM-80-21 data.

  • The Constraint: IES rules strictly prohibit projecting a lifespan longer than six times the actual test duration.
  • Audit Example: If the LED chips were tested for 10,000 hours, the manufacturer cannot legally claim an $L_{70}$ life of 100,000 hours. They are limited to a claim of 60,000 hours.
  • The Check: Request the TM-21 calculator spreadsheet. Verify that the "In-Situ Temperature Measurement Test" (ISTMT) temperature in the fixture report is lower than or equal to the temperature used in the LM-80 chip report. If the fixture runs hotter than the chip test, the lifespan projection is invalid.

Photometric Integrity: Why .ies Files Matter

A PDF layout is a static snapshot. For high-stakes projects, procurement teams should request the raw .ies file (LM-63 format).

Validation in AGi32 or Visual

Using software like AGi32, engineers can import the .ies file to simulate the exact light distribution.

  • Beam Distribution: Verify the spacing-to-mounting-height ratio. A UFO high bay with a 120° beam angle may create excessive glare (high UGR) if mounted too low, whereas a 90° or 60° lens might be required for high-rack aisles to manage rack shadows.
  • Uniformity: Ensure the "Max/Min" and "Avg/Min" ratios meet ANSI/IES RP-7-21 recommendations for industrial facilities.

Technicians servicing LED High Bay and LED shop lights in a high-ceiling warehouse

Economic Impact: Scenario Modeling for Cold Storage

To demonstrate the value of rigorous auditing, we modeled a retrofit for a 25,000 sq ft cold storage facility. In these environments, lighting efficiency has a "double-dip" effect: energy is saved on the lights, and the refrigeration system works less because LEDs emit significantly less heat than metal halide (MH) fixtures.

Case Study: 50-Fixture Retrofit

In this scenario, we replaced 50x 400W MH fixtures (458W total system draw) with 150W UFO LED high bays.

Metric Value Unit Rationale
Annual Energy Savings ~$24,283 USD Based on 24/7 ops @ $0.18/kWh
Annual Maintenance Savings ~$6,789 USD Avoided lamp/ballast replacements
HVAC Cooling Credit ~$858 USD Reduced heat load on refrigeration
Simple Payback Period ~2.3 Months After $5,000 utility rebate
Carbon Reduction ~50 Metric Tons Annual CO2e avoided

Modeling Note (Reproducible Parameters): This deterministic model assumes 24/7 operation (8,760 hours/year), a $0.18/kWh utility rate, and a 3.2 COP for refrigeration. Maintenance savings include labor at $110/hour. If the utility rate drops to $0.10/kWh, the payback extends to ~4.5 months.

The "Fixtures vs. Area" Trap

A common procurement mistake is accepting a vendor's fixture count without a photometric check. In our scenario model, a conservative grid layout for a 100' x 80' space suggested a total load of ~659 kW if improperly densified. This would exceed the National Electrical Code (NEC) continuous load limits for standard 20A/277V circuits. Auditing the layout ensures you don't over-order fixtures or under-design your electrical circuits.

Summary Checklist for RFP Finalization

Before finalizing a contract for UFO high bay lighting, ensure the following documentation is verified and archived:

  1. LM-79 Report: Issued by an NVLAP-accredited lab; test voltage and ambient temperature match the site.
  2. DLC Listing: SKU matches the DLC QPL exactly; status is "Premium" if required.
  3. UL/ETL Listing: File number verified in the UL Product iQ database; standard UL 1598 confirmed.
  4. TM-21 Report: Life projection ($L_{70}$) does not exceed 6x the LM-80 test duration.
  5. IES Files: Raw .ies data provided and validated for uniformity and lux levels in layout software.
  6. Warranty & Support: 5-year warranty terms confirmed, including labor or shipping coverage if applicable, as per the official support policy.

By moving beyond the marketing brochure and auditing the primary technical artifacts, procurement teams can ensure long-term reliability, maximize utility rebates, and eliminate the risk of costly post-installation rework.

Aircraft hangar with high-ceiling UFO LED High Bay lights illuminating small planes and a helicopter during maintenance


Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional engineering, legal, or financial advice. All electrical installations must comply with local codes and the National Electrical Code (NEC). Consult a licensed professional engineer for project-specific lighting designs.

Sources

Leave a comment

Please note: comments must be approved before they are published.